<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>Concordance properties of parallel links</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Daniel Ruberman</dc:creator><dc:creator>Saso Strle</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>57M25</dc:subject><dc:subject>57Q60</dc:subject><dc:subject>concordance of links</dc:subject><dc:subject>split links</dc:subject>
<dc:description>We investigate the concordance properties of &quot;parallel links&quot; $P(K)$, given by the $(2,0)$ cable of a knot $K$. We focus on the question: if $P(K)$ is concordant to a split link, is $K$ necessarily slice? We show that if $P(K)$ is smoothly concordant to a split link, then many smooth concordance invariants of $K$ must vanish, including the $\tau$ and $s$-invariants, as well as suitably normalized $d$-invariants of Dehn surgeries on $K$. We also investigate the $(2,2\ell)$ cables $P_{\ell}(K)$, and find obstructions to smooth concordance to the sum of the $(2,2\ell)$ torus link and a split link.</dc:description>
<dc:publisher>Indiana University Mathematics Journal</dc:publisher>
<dc:date>2013</dc:date>
<dc:type>text</dc:type>
<dc:format>pdf</dc:format>
<dc:identifier>10.1512/iumj.2013.62.4982</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>10.1512/iumj.2013.62.4982</dc:source>
<dc:language>en</dc:language>
<dc:relation>Indiana Univ. Math. J. 62 (2013) 799 - 814</dc:relation>
<dc:coverage>state-of-the-art mathematics</dc:coverage>
<dc:rights>http://iumj.org/access/</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>