<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>Quasiconcave solutions to elliptic problems in convex rings</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Chiara Bianchini</dc:creator><dc:creator>Marco Longinetti</dc:creator><dc:creator>Paolo Salani</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>35J25</dc:subject><dc:subject>35J65</dc:subject><dc:subject>35B05</dc:subject><dc:subject>convexity</dc:subject><dc:subject>level sets</dc:subject><dc:subject>elliptic equations</dc:subject><dc:subject>quasiconcave envelope</dc:subject><dc:subject>Minkowski addition</dc:subject>
<dc:description>We investigate the convexity of level sets of solutions to general elliptic equations in a convex ring $\Omega$. In particular, if $u$ is a classical solution which has constant (distinct) values on the two connected components of $\partial\Omega$, we consider its quasi-concave envelope $u^{*}$ (i.e., the function whose superlevel sets are the convex envelopes of those of $u$) and we find suitable assumptions which force $u^{*}$ to be a subsolution of the equation. If a comparison principle holds, this yields $u=u^{*}$ and then $u$ is quasi-concave.</dc:description>
<dc:publisher>Indiana University Mathematics Journal</dc:publisher>
<dc:date>2009</dc:date>
<dc:type>text</dc:type>
<dc:format>pdf</dc:format>
<dc:identifier>10.1512/iumj.2009.58.3539</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>10.1512/iumj.2009.58.3539</dc:source>
<dc:language>en</dc:language>
<dc:relation>Indiana Univ. Math. J. 58 (2009) 1565 - 1590</dc:relation>
<dc:coverage>state-of-the-art mathematics</dc:coverage>
<dc:rights>http://iumj.org/access/</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>